Epicurean Humanism might be a novel mix, but it’s a mix of several quite old and well-tried philosophies.
- Greek and Indian philosophy,
- The philosophy of David Hume and
- modern Cognitive Psychotherapy.
It tries to combine all the good points of these movements.
Why do we call it “Epicurean Humanism”? Well, as a name it’s moderately compact and relatively informative. One alternative would be to go for something more informative, like “Secular Humanist Epicurean-Emotive Rational Buddhist Stoicism” ; another would be to have something compact but uninformative like “Kitianism” (after Zeno of Kition). Me, I think “Epicurean Humanism” is a reasonable compromise.
Some of the key principles are:
Happiness is mostly just the capacity for pleasure.
You can damage this capacity by helpless craving or by pointless cynicism.
Or you can nurture it by learning to take pleasure in small things, and giving up those habits of thought that get in its way.
The cause of unhappiness can be found in your thinking style.
The habits of thought that cause the problems are called absolute judgements.
By practice you can retrain these habits, to produce so-called relative judgements.
This does, to be sure, require some mental techniques (such as self-examination and mindfulness), as well as behavioural practice. But it’s by inhabiting the new character that you grow into it.
The habit of happiness is best learned among like-minded people
You can nurture these habits by meeting and socialising, mentoring, studying and practising and encouraging one another.
The details are too numerous and convoluted to lay out in full here. Which is rather the point of founding a body to promote the philosophy; it has to be shared in community, not taught in books.
And definitely not taught in blogs!